Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Incentives Matter's avatar

A libertarian society will always work better if there is more cultural homogeneity and greater equality. If I am similar to my neighbours in many ways, and trust them highly, I am less in need of lots of law and order, government agencies, and big redistributive schemes. But libertarians won't have the sort of government that can protect that equilibrium, so even if you set it up initially, it won't last.

I think you are absolutely correct in the main point that there is no contradiction in the arguments, both are an argument for less government power. To play devil's advocate for the 'globalists' they would argue there are some big problems that require international cooperation to deal with, so we need things like the UN, WHO, WTO etc. I don't think they are wrong, but how to maintain any oversight and what degree of power any of these should have are issues, and because you can't have good oversight many people are suspicious of any power you give to them.

Expand full comment
Tereza Coraggio's avatar

Very thoughtful post, my good doctor. Let me throw a wrench through the eye of that needle ;-) If someone ever gives us the chance to reinvent immigration, I'd put a 5-yr pause on it, including college. Simultaneously, I'd like to end foreign ownership by corporations in other countries, states or counties (or by university regents in towns) and let every place be made, by its own inhabitants, into a place we'd want to go rather than leave. Those already there can develop the policies, including ownership, that work for them. THEN the question of immigration is just a matter of travel and adventure, not escaping oppression.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts